This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [PATCH] Re: 3 new fails with builtin patch
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>, Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
- Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 08:33:46 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: 3 new fails with builtin patch
- References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1020330082830.26274D-100000@taarna.cygnus.com><3CA5F75B.5040107@unitus.it> <flvgbc2udf.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
> Incidently, Mark, I think we all agreed that new testcases should go
> under g++.dg, not g++.old-deja. g++.dg don't unilateraly set any
> optimization level, I think that is a good path (we would have caught
> this regression).
I agree. I was just applying Roger's patch. I could (should?) have
asked Roger to rework his tests for the g++.dg testsuite, but I wanted
to close the PR quickly so we could go on to other things. In hindsight,
that was a mistake.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com