Re: RFC: Initial patch to use runtime demangler

[Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>]

On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 06:29:05PM -0800, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> 
> > Sugestions?
> 
> Break out the champagne, I'd say. This day's been long in coming. Thanks 
> for stepping up on this one...
> 
> Everything looks fine to me. One thing I'd add it to try and compile 
> with CXXFLAGS='-fno-exceptions', although since this is "C" I guess this 
> is not really an issue, is it. Never mind.

Hmmmmmm.

All the other things which I've thought would not be issues turned out to be
critical :-) so this is probably a worthwhile check.  For that matter,
-fno-exceptions doesn't get tested as much as it should.


> Does it pass the testresults? If so, trunk and branch, pronto is my verdict.

I need to get DJ's (or Mark's) approval for the include&libiberty changes.

There's some weirdness getting the verbose terminate handler exported (to
nobody's surprise, it's something with the "demangled names" feature).  More
on that tomorrow, after some sweet sweet sleep.

Haven't tried it on the branch yet.


Phil

-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams