This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Results for g++ 3.1 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu

>>>>> "Nathan" == Nathan Myers <ncm-nospam@cantrip.org> writes:

> On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 04:44:18AM +0100, Peter Schmid wrote:
>> I tested g++ 3.1 20020302 versus some applications:
>> 
>> Here are the results:
>> 
>> current boost cvs:
>> All tests pass. g++ does not provide the zero sized base class
>> optimization. Therefore, there are seven "failures" for empty_* types in
>> object_type_traits_test.cpp.

> Eh?!?  I had thought that the empty-base optimization (actually, a
> generalization of it) was one of the vaunted features of the new ABI.  

It is.  Peter, can you clarify?

Jason
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]