This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch for 64-bit HP-UX libstdc++-v3

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:10:55 -0800
Subject: Re: Patch for 64-bit HP-UX libstdc++-v3
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1020315102621.27416B-100000@taarna.cygnus.com> <orofhpu06e.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 03:59:37PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> it looks like libiberty is always archive only.  Does this introduce
> >> problems when libstdc++-v3 is linked against libiberty?

Personally, I think it's slightly silly to link in a routine from
libiberty when the function we want is in libc (even if it is 
under a different name).

r~

References:
- Re: Patch for 64-bit HP-UX libstdc++-v3
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: Patch for 64-bit HP-UX libstdc++-v3
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]