This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: More test results...
>>>>> "Benjamin" == Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
>> True. But if it only has meaning as a specialization, why was the change
>> useful in the first place?
> Compatibility testing revealed that there were duplicate symbols due to
> compiler oddnesses.
Right but why were there implicit instantiations being generated? If there
hadn't been, the problem wouldn't have been noticed.
> At this point, I think the preference is to keep the code the way it is
> now.
Okeedokee.
> If you've actually fixed the static const issue, then perhaps the stl
> changes to enums can be reverted. Thoughts?
I haven't been following that discussion, sorry.
Jason