This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix wide charater literals (was Re: [RFC] Unexpectedcompiler twist of the wcscoll issue)
- From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:39:36 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix wide charater literals (was Re: [RFC] Unexpectedcompiler twist of the wcscoll issue)
- References: <3C8DF94C.D182C65D@unitus.it> <20020312170140.Q2204@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <3C8E2880.3000307@unitus.it> <20020313053419.M2434@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 05:10:40PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
>>Just to be sure, have you tested also the libstdc++ testsuite on a
>>linux-gnu system? There are many wstring literals in it and if
>>everything is ok you should obtain 1 unexpected
>>(c99_classification_macros_c.cc) and 0 expected failures.
>>
>
>I get
>
>FAIL: 21_strings/ctor_copy_dtor.cc execution test
>FAIL: 21_strings/insert.cc execution test
>FAIL: 26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors)
>FAIL: 27_io/ostream_inserter_char.cc execution test
>
>glibc 2.2.90 without stdio mmap and new regex, binutils ~ 2.12.
>Not a regression since before the patch though.
>
> Jakub
>
Thanks for your feedbcak.
On i686? There are 3 fails which should not on i686?!? And 0 expected, I
suppose? Anyway, on my i686-pc-linux-gnu it looks like we are still not
at end of the story: non collate_members_wchar_t.cc now fails at 129,
that is the problem at 107 was cured by your patch but still there is
something wrong somewhere :-(
Investigating...
Ciao, Paolo.