Re: [RFC] libstdc++/5734

[Levente Farkas <lfarkas at mindmaker dot hu>]

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> 
> Levente Farkas <lfarkas@mindmaker.hu> writes:
> 
> | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> | >
> | > Levente Farkas <lfarkas@mindmaker.hu> writes:
> | >
> | > [...]
> | >
> | > | > I'd rather not remove the function, since a) it can be useful, and b)
> | > | > I suspect people are already using it.
> | > |
> | > | this is true for all sgi extension too, and since they are moved to
> | > | different namespace the same problem come up with them too...
> | >
> | > The problem for those extensions moved to <ext/xxx> is less acute that
> | > this one -- here we have a member function, whereas in the former, the
> | > users just need to adjust (almost automatically) headers.
> |
> | and use different namespace!!!
> 
> I think it was intended that <ext/xxx> should bring them into std::
> via using-declaration. No?
> 
> | they have to rewrite it everywhere:-(((
> 
> No, they should not.

AFAIK they are in namespace __gnu_cxx, so they must:-(

-- 
  Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"