This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [RFC] libstdc++/5734
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 05:13:33PM +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
> On the other hand, I'm not sure about which is the current stance of the
> project wrt this kind of extensions: should they be sooner or later
> sequestered somewhere or not? I agree that they should not be harmful
> (Not Our Problem :-) but they are neither part of the ISO/ANSI standard...
>
> For instance, STLPort enables this push_back() extension with a macro
> named _ENABLE_ANACHRONISMS, or something like that.
I've been pushing for some form of _GLIBCPP_ENABLE_EXTENSIONS for a while
now; it just needs more thought and planning than what I've been able to
give to it. I'd like to be more granular than a simple all-or-nothing
switch, though.
Phil
--
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams