This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: Strange behaviour of "cin"



I'm moving this over to the libstdc++ list: there is no reason to keep it 
on both gcc and libstdc++.

> I am sorry I should have mentioned it again, I did that in my initial mail.
> I am using gcc 3.0.3 on SCO 5.0.5.
> Is this a peculiar behaviour on SCO or is gcc not able to *fix* this header
> correctly. I suspect the reason to be
> the inline definitions, and there corresponding macro definitions, for
> various type identification functions present
> in the <ctype.h> header. These are over-ridden if we use <cctype>.

You'll probably need to add SCO-specific ctype bits. See 
libstdc++-v3/config/os/*/bits/ctype_*

-benjamin


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]