This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Suggestions on renaming headers (was Re: [PATCH] Update backward/algo.h)
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:03:36 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: Suggestions on renaming headers (was Re: [PATCH] Update backward/algo.h)
> Like you say, this should be easy to solve. Clearing and resetting the
> .SUFFIXES pseudotarget should help in most cases. Listing all the headers in
> a .PRECIOUS rule might help. (The multiple makefiles make this interesting.)
I'd think src/Makefile.am would be sufficient.
> Well, I think that after moving the headers we'll still have a sound
> naming convention.
Ditto.
> My opinion: we should move the headers /and/ add some special targets to
> the makefiles, like .PRECIOUS and/or .SUFFIXES. Someone with wider Make
> experience than I will need to help with those targets.
Ok. I've asked for help with this part.
Gaby?
-benjamin