This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Stephen Webb's staging headers patch
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Stephen Webb's staging headers patch
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 01:13:20 -0700
- cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>, Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
> Ben> Perhaps, but not best case
>>> or should we switch to target-dependent std_limits.h like atomicity.h?
I don't see that we have any choice but to do this, in general. When
cross-compiling, it seems we would have to do this. Of course, we could
share a lot of the code between systems; most 32-bit systems are going
to have very similar values for things, for example.
Mark Mitchell email@example.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com