Re: Common V3 coding bug

[Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>]

On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:49:41AM -0700, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> > I will try.  Also, if someone (Phil, maybe?) wants to merge the
> > V3 changes from the branch that's fine by me too.  There might be bits
> > that you would rather I'd do differently; for example, I've used `using 
> > base::member;' rather than `this->member' in some of the changes thus
> > far.
> 
> A ha! A third way, and a call for a volunteer! I second the nomination of 
> Phil to track this and manage the divergence. We can see if he accepts.

I can do this.  Probably sit down once a week and check for divergence.

Before I start doing more, there are some changes in my local tree that
I'd like to either finalize with input from others, or throw away (likwise
with input).  Maintaining the diffs/conflicts is getting difficult; I've
already thrown away some of the non-libstdc++ ones.

> using base::member;
> 
> seems fine by me.

Should we (read, "not me" :-) start converting other code to use this form,
for continuity?

Phil

-- 
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
                                     - anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC