This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Common V3 coding bug
- To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Subject: Re: Common V3 coding bug
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 13:59:59 -0400
- Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <flbsmigog6.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <20010718185549.B10610@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 06:55:49PM +0100, Neil Booth wrote:
> Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:-
> > Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
> >
> > | For future reference, I'm in favor of a strict and
> > | standards-conformant compiler by default so that bugs like this are
> > | easily found.
> >
> > 100% agreed. But we seem to the only persons wanting that :-(
>
> Well, you've got another vote here :-)
Aye, seco- well, "fourthed".
My dream compiler is extremely pedantic and fussy by default, and requires
command-line switches to enable any of its myriad extensions. Hey, that's
why we have makefiles.
Phil
--
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
- anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC