This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: std::basic_string<A<B>, std::char_traits<A<B> >,std::allocator<A<B> > >::_Rep::_S_max_size(data)
- To: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
- Subject: Re: std::basic_string<A<B>, std::char_traits<A<B> >,std::allocator<A<B> > >::_Rep::_S_max_size(data)
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 12:30:40 -0700
- Cc: bkoz at redhat dot com, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1010609115129.24671K-100000@taarna.cygnus.com><200106091917.PAA10087@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
>>>>> "John" == John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> writes:
John> think this should be poked at a bit more. At the moment, it
John> is my understanding that the symbol is not being output
John> because of the lack of weak support. Is this correct?
Yes.
The test-cases with V3 itself should simply use explicit
instantiations for the versions that are not explicitly instantiated
in the library. Having the test-cases fail doesn't really indicate
anything interesting: it simply reflects a known unimplemented feature
in the compiler.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com