This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [RFC] "C" header options
- To: stephen at bregmasoft dot com
- Subject: Re: [RFC] "C" header options
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: 08 Jun 2001 17:58:01 +0200
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, mark at codesourcery dot com, jason at redhat dot com
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <200106080312.f583C5m05665@fillmore.constant.com> <01060809422500.22527@swebb-slack>
"Stephen M. Webb" <stephen@bregmasoft.com> writes:
| It's my opinion, and yes, I am slightly biased here, that 3) is the best choice
| for the long run (read 3.1) since it is robust AND it's compliant AND it's
| simple.
You're not alone to think that, but as you said it is hard to argue with
"it works" :-)
-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com