This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
Date: 25 May 2001 09:28:35 +0200
Cc: aj at suse dot de, gdr at codesourcery dot com, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, drepper at cygnus dot com
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <u8ofsi4j7f.fsf@gromit.moeb> <flsnhufq9x.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <u88zjm3p0r.fsf@gromit.moeb> <20010524235559E.mitchell@codesourcery.com>

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

| Does this make sense?

Yes, that is more or less what I just outlined.  With the caveat that
C99 functions will go in std::c99.

-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC                       http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]