This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Version number misery

To: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>
Subject: Re: Version number misery
From: Levente Farkas <lfarkas at mindmaker dot hu>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 12:33:11 +0200
Cc: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: Mindmaker Ltd.
References: <20010517035735.A27579@alinoe.com> <20010516220608.A20611@disaster.jaj.com> <flk83g5mel.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
Reply-To: lfarkas at mindmaker dot hu

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> 
> Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com> writes:
> 
> | I'll guess that whatever its form is when 3.0 is actually released, will
> | probably stay around for a while.  At least until 3.1.
> 
> But we should make it explicit that users should not depend on it.
> 
> -- Gaby

ok. it seems I can't follow the libstdc++ development.
could someone describe me what is the current status of it?
what will be the status when 3.0 will be released ?
and what is the plan for 3.1 ?
what will be ready and frozen, what will be ready but not frozen,
what will be usable ....

IMHO it's a genereal faq question and would be useful to put on the
website too.
yours.

 -- Levente
 "The only thing worse than not knowing the truth is
  ruining the bliss of ignorance."

References:
- Version number misery
  - From: Carlo Wood
- Re: Version number misery
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: Version number misery
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]