This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: libstdc++, autoconf, and /lib/cpp (was Fw: Re: GCC 3.0 Status , Report)
- To: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Subject: Re: libstdc++, autoconf, and /lib/cpp (was Fw: Re: GCC 3.0 Status , Report)
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 19:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
> Shouldn't have to do either one, or shouldn't have to do the --with?
To do --with unless doing a canadian cross.
> CXXCPP is being passed down, it's just incorrect because autoconf believes
> that "xgcc -E" doesn't work properly (since stdlib.h couldn't be found).
Then perhaps AC_PROG_CXXCPP needs to be done so that it's
$(blddir)/../../gcc/xgcc -B./ -E
or whatever.
Capiche?
> It feels like we're papering over a problem... i.e., if things like
> stdlib.h can't be found by the newly-built xgcc during configure, I can't
> wait until we actually try and compile the library.
Let's just try forcing CXXCPP to be the right thing then.
-benjamin