Thanks to you for your work! (was: Re: Boost regression testsuite results for...)

[Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>]

Hi!

I avail myself of your very kind attention to summarize a few points:

- Regarding Boost, as Peter Schmid clearly indicated, the most
disturbing Gcc failure seems to be call_traits_test.cpp, core language
related, probably. The other 3 failures *very* likely are *not*
libstdc++-v3 related :) (PR2559)
(I consider the concept checking code disabled for the moment, til the
end of the experimental period ...... when eventually a far less "ad
hoc" and more theoretically founded approach (gdr ;) will supersede it
completely :)

- Unfortunately, whereas the libstdc++-v3 accompanying the current
Gcc3.0 works well for me, I cannot say so for that bundled with Gcc3.1
(PR2523). I'm really worried by this, because the newer hot stuff is in
the latter and my system is very common and stable :(

- What about Loki ?!?


Thanks again,
P.


Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

> I appreciate the efforts of everybody involved with making sure that
> gcc-3, libstdc++-v3, and boost work well together.
>
> thanks!
> benjami