This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)
Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com> writes:
| On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 06:49:22PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > | ... Is it time to make some "GNU C++ extensions" namespace
| > | (called glibcpp, glibcxx, gnu_cxx, etc[*]), sequester the concept-checking
| > | code there, and remove occurances of "boost" entirely?
| >
| > I'm not opposed to ::__gnu_cxx if that makes your work easier.
|
| Sounds good. How about some working guidelines:
|
| 1) Everything from __gnu_cxx is always named in a fully-qualified
| manner, __gnu_cxx::foo. Er, well, __gnu_cxx::_Foo, etc.
Yes, __gnu_cxx::_Foo or __gnu_cxx::__foo.
| 2) It must be possible to selectively enable/disable __gnu_cxx
| extensions.
Sounds reasonable.
| 3) ??
|
| Obviously we don't want to devote too much time and energy to extensions
| when 3.0 is still suffering.
Yes, GCC-3.0 is normally feature-frozen. We should focus on bug-fixes.
Thanks,
-- Gaby