This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Problems with the new concepts checking code (boost)


Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com> writes:

| On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 06:49:22PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > | ... Is it time to make some "GNU C++ extensions" namespace
| > | (called glibcpp, glibcxx, gnu_cxx, etc[*]), sequester the concept-checking
| > | code there, and remove occurances of "boost" entirely?
| > 
| > I'm not opposed to ::__gnu_cxx if that makes your work easier.
| 
| Sounds good.  How about some working guidelines:
| 
|     1)  Everything from __gnu_cxx is always named in a fully-qualified
|         manner, __gnu_cxx::foo.  Er, well, __gnu_cxx::_Foo, etc.

Yes, __gnu_cxx::_Foo or __gnu_cxx::__foo.

|     2)  It must be possible to selectively enable/disable __gnu_cxx
|         extensions.

Sounds reasonable.

|     3)  ??
| 
| Obviously we don't want to devote too much time and energy to extensions
| when 3.0 is still suffering.

Yes, GCC-3.0 is normally feature-frozen.  We should focus on bug-fixes.

Thanks,

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]