Re: Doxygen - another sample, preliminary comments

[Rich Churcher <churcher at ihug dot com dot au>]

Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com> writes:

> Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> | All this Doxygen stuff looks extremely promising. I'd like to start
> | checking in patches to make the libstdc++ documentation use it.
> 
> I didn't (yet) have time to look into it.  I would like to defer its
> integration after 2.91 -- the time needed to inspect it.  Thoughts?

FWIW, I agree.  I think it's going to take a little while to set out a
stable format for the documentation that (most) everyone is happy
with.  It makes sense to wait until everything is a bit more settled
with all the various moves that have taken place recently.  And it
won't hurt to take a longer look at Doxygen itself, although I really
do think this is a good solution for long-term use.

I'm going back home to New Zealand for a month, but might burn a CD to
take with me so I can play some more.  Will be happy to contribute
further on my return, if/as required.

-- 
Cheers,
Rich.