This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Moving the libstdc++ lists

To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot COM>
Subject: Re: Moving the libstdc++ lists
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 20:55:04 -0500
Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, libstdc++ at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0011170029090.68795-100000@deneb.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <200011170029.QAA02437@toledo.synopsys.com>

On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 04:29:29PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> 
> For libstdc++-prs, one difficulty is that we are likely to get C++ problem
> results where it is initially not clear if the bug is in the compiler or
> the library.  It might be cleaner just to have one combined set of prs.

I would agree with that.  <Insert canned plea for a working gnatsweb.>


> For cvs, having a separate list to track checkins might make it easier
> for developers who only care about libstdc++ to spare themselves unwanted
> traffic.

Definitely.


-- 
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moving the libstdc++ lists
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

References:
- Moving the libstdc++ lists
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: Moving the libstdc++ lists
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]