This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Doxygen (was Re: Proposed man pages: <vector> sample, RFC)
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Doxygen (was Re: Proposed man pages: <vector> sample, RFC)
- From: george at moberg dot com
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 10:28:19 -0500
- CC: churcher at ihug dot com dot au, libstdc++ at sources dot redhat dot com
- Organization: Moberg Research, Inc.
- References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1001114102649.11711A-100000@cse.cygnus.com>
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> > http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/
>
> thanks.
>
> > > Also, is there
> > > anyway you could provide an example image for either or both of the
> > > graphs?
> >
> > Check the attached files. Note that this is from 2.90.8 snapshot, and that I
> > didn't add _any_ code documentation in the form of javadoc/QT comments so the
> > only thing that's meaningful are the graphs.
>
> Wow. That's definitely the kind of stuff I'd like to see. Please, let's
> figure out a way to use this tool.
Though I'm not really plugged into libstdc++-v3 development (I use
snapshots of it in my project, as v2 didn't have thread-safe strings),
it seems to me that you could start with the defaults, and maybe write a
script that converts the comments in the libstdc++ code to javadoc-style
or QT-style comments. This is discussed here:
http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/docblocks.html#docblocks
If I come up with a decent script to do automated conversion of the code
comments for my project, I'll post it to the list.
--
George T. Talbot
<george at moberg dot com>