This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Proposed man pages: <vector> sample, RFC
- To: dhoover at acm dot org
- Subject: Re: Proposed man pages: <vector> sample, RFC
- From: Levente Farkas <lfarkas at mindmaker dot hu>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:51:22 +0100
- Cc: Rich Churcher <churcher at ihug dot com dot au>,libstdc++ at sources dot redhat dot com
- Organization: Mindmaker Ltd.
- References: <m3em0f95s1.fsf@ihug.com.au> <3A101C29.CB56389A@rochester.rr.com>
- Reply-To: lfarkas at mindmaker dot hu
Dean Hoover wrote:
>
> Rich Churcher wrote:
>
> > [ I'm sorry this got so long. If some list subscribers don't want to
> > read threads regarding documentation, or don't have time, I'll place
> > the "man pages" string in the subject for threads I start
> > to assist with scoring/filtering ]
> >
> > Ok. I've revisited the thread on this list (back in June) discussing man page
> > documentation, which begins at:
> >
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libstdc++/2000-q2/msg00832.html
> >
> > I didn't read it very carefully then, but I have now. There are
> > several good points made, not least of which are concerns about
> > duplicating SGI's HTML documentation (we shouldn't) and considering
> > texinfo format (we should).
> >
> >
>
> Have you checked out: http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/
I'm the second who'd like to see such a documentation.
-- Levente http://petition.eurolinux.org/index_html
"The only thing worse than not knowing the truth is
ruining the bliss of ignorance."