This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: ld 2.9.5 and gcc 2.95.2 libstdc++-v3
- To: oliver <oliver at zeroknowledge dot com>
- Subject: Re: ld 2.9.5 and gcc 2.95.2 libstdc++-v3
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 12:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: libstdc++ at sources dot redhat dot com
This issue seems generally applicable to everybody on this list, so I
think it makes sense to just discuss it in public, if that's ok with you.
Can you please provide specifics on the platform you are using, and
versions and configure options for the various items in question.
(g++, libstdc++, ld, as, binutils, os type and version.)
If you could provide example code, it would help clarify the issue.
That being said, there has been some discussion of libstdc++-v3 ld issues
on the binutils list. You might want to check out posts on binutils by
both me, Ulrich Drepper, and Phil Edwards, and perhaps others.
> - Exceptions missing catch blocks which should have caught them. Literally,
> the exception in some builds will be caught be the default handler for no
> apparent reason. Rebuilding the exact same sources can make this go away.
?
No idea.
> - Strange behaviours with inappropriately inlined functions? We don't know
> if inlining is the root cause, but we have experienced problems with STL or
> other IO functions causing data corruption or inexplicably failing in
> certain conditions. The problems only appear rarely but consistently.
If it's consistent, perhaps you could help use reproduce it.....
thanks,
benjamin