This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++-prs@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: libstdc++/39
- To: bkoz at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: libstdc++/39
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at cygnus dot com>
- Date: 22 Mar 2000 19:27:00 -0000
- Cc: libstdc++-prs at sourceware dot cygnus dot com,
- Reply-To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at cygnus dot com>
The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/39; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@cygnus.com>
To: "James A. Bednar" <jbednar@cs.utexas.edu>
Cc: pme@sourceware.cygnus.comm, libstdc++-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: libstdc++/39
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 11:23:24 -0800 (PST)
> That's very strange; I assumed that when GCC suddenly started putting
> things in g++-3 instead of g++-2 it signified a change from version 2
> to version 3, but I suppose that was silly of me :-). All it means,
> though, is that the bug is in the version 2 includes and not the
> version 3 ones. And that as a result I need to report it to gcc-bugs
> instead? (Or I can just give up on it :-).
Yeah. I know, the numerology makes no sense.
I strongly suggest using the 2.90.8 release. You'll be able to DL it on
friday from
sourceware.cygnus.com/libstdc++
best,
-benjamin