Re: libstdc++/34

[Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>]

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/34; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel.Dos-Reis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
To: bkoz@cygnus.com
Cc: gdr@sourceware.cygnus.com, libstdc++-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: libstdc++/34
Date: 21 Mar 2000 09:20:26 +0100

 [ Oops, this bounced ]
 
 Hi Benjamin,
 
 I saw you're doing a great job the the bug reports.  Thanks a lot.
 
 bkoz@cygnus.com writes:
 
 | The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/34; it has been noted by GNATS.
 | 
 | From: bkoz@cygnus.com
 | To: Gabriel@sourceware.cygnus.com, dot@sourceware.cygnus.com,
 |   Dos-Reis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr, jsk29@cornell.edu,
 |   libstdc++-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com, nobody@sourceware.cygnus.com
 | Cc:  
 | Subject: Re: libstdc++/34
 | Date: 20 Mar 2000 20:19:21 -0000
 | 
 |  Synopsis: Segmentation fault when resizing a valarry.
 |  
 |  Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->gdr
 |  Responsible-Changed-By: bkoz
 |  Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 20 12:19:21 2000
 |  Responsible-Changed-Why:
 |      26_numerics
 |  State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 |  State-Changed-By: bkoz
 |  State-Changed-When: Mon Mar 20 12:19:21 2000
 |  State-Changed-Why:
 |      this no longer seems to be a bug in the 2.0.8.x series.
 
 Yes, the recent changes in valarray were designed specifically to
 allow reasonable behaviour when resizing valarrays on some types.  I
 know testsuites arre missing though.
 
 Thanks,
 
 -- Gaby