[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

gcc_jit_context_new_union_type()

To: jit@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: gcc_jit_context_new_union_type()
From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 21:45:03 +0100
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Delivered-to: listarch-jit@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-to: mailing list jit@gcc.gnu.org
List-help: <mailto:jit-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-post: <mailto:jit@gcc.gnu.org>
List-subscribe: <mailto:jit-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-list: contact jit-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Sender: jit-owner@gcc.gnu.org

Should gcc_jit_context_new_union_type() return gcc_jit_struct* instead
of gcc_jit_type*?

Regards
Dibyendu

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc_jit_context_new_union_type()
  - From: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Basic blocks, jump targets and locals
Next by Date: Re: gcc_jit_context_new_union_type()
Previous by thread: Re: Basic blocks, jump targets and locals
Next by thread: Re: gcc_jit_context_new_union_type()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread