This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: GCJ 4.9.3 on mips64el-linux failing to build Ant.
- From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado at elephly dot net>
- To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 17:46:47 +0100
- Subject: Re: GCJ 4.9.3 on mips64el-linux failing to build Ant.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <87k2qlgtd0 dot fsf at elephly dot net> <56237454 dot 1000808 at redhat dot com> <874mh9j2rv dot fsf at elephly dot net> <56320DAB dot 3040207 at redhat dot com> <8737wtj1ny dot fsf at elephly dot net> <5672C053 dot 9050905 at redhat dot com> <87si222dda dot fsf at elephly dot net> <569629C8 dot 8070400 at redhat dot com>
Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
> On 13/01/16 06:38, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>
>> Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 10/29/2015 12:32 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>>> Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/29/2015 12:08 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>>>>> Hereâs the complete log that I get when building GCJ 4.9.3 and running
>>>>>> the tests:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://hydra.gnu.org/build/758888/log/raw
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't see the output of the libjava testsuite. "make check-target-libjava"
>>>>> should do it.
>>>>
>>>> Hereâs the libjava testsuite output:
>>>
>>> No, the actual testsuite output. It's in a logfile.
>>
>> Attached is âlibjava.logâ from the directory
>> âbuild/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/libjava/testsuite/â. One obvious
>> problem according to the log is this:
>>
>> gcj: error trying to exec 'ecj1': execvp: No such file or directory
>>
>> GCJ is configured with the following flags (in addition to the usual GCC
>> flags):
>>
>> "--enable-java-home"
>> "--enable-gjdoc"
>> "--with-ecj-jar=ecj-4.9.jar"
>> "--enable-languages=java"
>>
>> âecj-4.9.jarâ is the one downloaded from
>> <ftp://sourceware.org/pub/java/ecj-4.9.jar>. I cannot build it from
>> source because that would require a JDK â GCJ is the first JDK Iâm
>> building on ARM and MIPS. Is this a problem? Is âecj-4.9.jarâ portable
>> or does it need to be cross-built for other platforms?
>
> It's portable. There's no particular problem with running the libgcj
> testsuite from bytecode files, so I would not worry about that. However,
> there are some serious problems in the testsuite output which indicate
> that gcj has some bugs on this platform.
Hi again,
is there anything else I can provide to assist you in identifying the
problem with GCJ on ARM and MIPS?
~~ Ricardo