This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Trouble building gcj 4.8.1
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: Mike Hearn <mike at plan99 dot net>
- Cc: GCC Java <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:04:57 +0100
- Subject: Re: Trouble building gcj 4.8.1
- References: <CANEZrP3wxTPvx5Ky2O1qds427t9LxtSt0Bm3GntjcN63_0+3rw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CANEZrP0vTN_MAe4jOamUqKnkyXgNYJ-bsUnovANV36evGdJWPA at mail dot gmail dot com> <51C87C22 dot 9030201 at redhat dot com> <CANEZrP2woCNh4P+a-xTWqqz+PKEi01C0PU+D_TVu1jn2CeDaNw at mail dot gmail dot com> <51C88147 dot 8060508 at redhat dot com> <CANEZrP0WwGL40Vguonwb2CLvpvYmCaRTkO+wZqZ6uTGvtGxu0w at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 06/25/2013 02:39 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Hmm, it seems there's one on my system already and it looks like the
> script at the bottom of this mail. I guess it's from Debian and isn't
> correct in some way. There's also an ecj1 that was installed when I
> ran without --enable-java-maintainer-mode but it's in
> $PREFIX/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.1/ecj1 - it seems
> like running them gives the same outputs. Perhaps ecj1 was meant to be
> installed as a symlink to the binary in libexec?
No, you have to put it in your own path. It does say so in the
instructions.
Andrew.