This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Which library implementation to use/work on?

From: Chris Burdess <dog at bluezoo dot org>
To: Mike Hearn <mike at plan99 dot net>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:43:31 +0000
Subject: Re: Which library implementation to use/work on?
References: <CANEZrP0Fg5YUrGFBUiFBPgVTDAGZAz4LKCATdwfYMsSAb0Aq1A@mail.gmail.com> <CANEZrP0Yj=Zs2WnfGKpgYX7JvStu0LjED4WZB-+cA9DQ49yqjg@mail.gmail.com> <CANEZrP0Abwb6BWPYma=EQusXWL36=aAwn4nYbsUtLDsdZ_u_CQ@mail.gmail.com>

Mike Hearn wrote:
> I understand the reasons for this policy. However, as you are planning
> on (eventually) replacing Classpath with OpenJDK completely, an
> exception in this case would seem to make logical sense. The code will
> end up not owned by the FSF no matter what.

Well, no. The FSF will still own Classpath.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which library implementation to use/work on?
  - From: Mike Hearn

References:
- Which library implementation to use/work on?
  - From: Mike Hearn
- Re: Which library implementation to use/work on?
  - From: Mike Hearn
- Re: Which library implementation to use/work on?
  - From: Mike Hearn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]