This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable

From: Stephen Kell <srk31 at srcf dot ucam dot org>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:45:47 +0000
Subject: Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
References: <20100123003835.GA13203@jmah3.christs.cam.ac.uk> <7230133d1001230132g4d15ac8bm7e594f0e6ef4c547@mail.gmail.com> <20100123145106.4ea45678@ernest-2.christs.cam.ac.uk> <4B5B7B0D.9000400@redhat.com> <20100125130912.07dba104@ernest-2.christs.cam.ac.uk> <4B5DA042.9000100@redhat.com>

> Thanks.
> 
> I've seen something like this years ago, but I can't remember what
> caused it.  I expect it's something quite simple, but I can't tell
> from what you've posted here.
> 
> If you can make a self-contained test case theat reproduces the
> problem I'll debug it.

Great -- thanks! The following tarball *should* be self-contained...
"make testcase" should trigger the bug.

http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~srk31/private/testcase-20100125.tar.bz2

Stephen

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
  - From: Stephen Kell
- Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
  - From: Stephen Kell
- Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
  - From: Stephen Kell
- Re: Mixing BC and CNI in the same executable
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]