This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Performance of GCJ JNI and CNI


Hi,

I have converted an application which makes more number of native
calls that was written using proprietary JVM compatible with version
Java 1.1 using GCJ.

I had tried to convert this application using GCJ + JNI as well as GCJ + CNI.
I don't see much performance improvements after using the GCJ
precompilation. ie., not using the interpreter.

Can someone help me to understand why there is no performance improvement.

I am compiling this for MIPS platform.

Thanks
Mala


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]