Re: classpath-0.98 merge for GCC-4.4

[Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>]

Andrew John Hughes wrote:

> Ideally, I'd prefer a GCJ release to be based on a Classpath
> release, if just so bug reports against GCJ 4.4 can be more
> closely linked to a Classpath release.

Me too.

> That said, I think the tree is in okay shape at the moment.  If
> you do merge now, I'd suggest using the time to test the
> completed merge, especially the new locale changes.

Yes.

> As a third option, perhaps the main merge could be done now,
> covering all the feature changes (GJDoc, localisation).  I
> could then submit the remaining bug fixes planned for 0.98 to
> GCJ separately, as they get sent to Classpath.  We'd then end
> up with 0.98 in GCJ (effectively).

That's my suggestion, as long as it doesn't make too much work
for Doko.

Andrew.