This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Streamtokenizer

On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "OneGuy" == OneGuy  <oneguyks@gmail.com> writes:
>
> OneGuy> Memory usage was even worse (55 MB with Classpath vs 35 MB with Sun's).
>
> It looks like our nextToken will often create a new StringBuffer.
> Perhaps it would be better to make one and cache it.
>
> FWIW I'd accept a clean patch to further optimize StreamTokenizer.
> Most likely the only reason it performs poorly is that it never popped
> up as a performance limiter before.

Double.parseDouble() could also be used, avoiding creating a Double each time.

I haven't really been following this stuff, but what is the situation
with merging in stuff from OpenJDK? It looks like they have a better
implementation here which could very easily be dropped in.

Bryce
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]