This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libgcj_bc.so not embedded

From: "J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza at gmail dot com>
To: "David Daney" <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:59:07 +0200
Subject: Re: libgcj_bc.so not embedded
References: <998d0e4a0704070600v2d62f29eufefcfc4fb4efe3e4@mail.gmail.com> <4617B69E.8040506@avtrex.com> <998d0e4a0704070851o48329771p8adab0aed7eec11b@mail.gmail.com>

2007/4/7, J.C. Pizarro <jcpiza@gmail.com>:

2007/4/7, David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>:
> J.C. Pizarro wrote:
> >
> > Remember, Java is generated to C++ with gcj and compiled with g++.
> That is incorrect and always has been.
>
> gcj directly generates assembly code for the target processor, just like
> all the other GCC language frontends.
>
> David Daney
>

Sure? Why GCJ depends on C++ of GCC?

The proof,

./configure ... --enable-languages=c,java doesn't work

./configure ... --enable-languages=c,c++,java works.

The tools gcjh and g++ are used.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libgcj_bc.so not embedded
  - From: Mohsen Saboorian

References:
- Re: libgcj_bc.so not embedded
  - From: J.C. Pizarro
- Re: libgcj_bc.so not embedded
  - From: David Daney
- Re: libgcj_bc.so not embedded
  - From: J.C. Pizarro

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]