This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Add JDWP VM_INIT JVMTI callback

From: Marco Trudel <mtrudel at gmx dot ch>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: tromey at redhat dot com, Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>, Java Patch List <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:07:53 +0100
Subject: Re: [RFA] Add JDWP VM_INIT JVMTI callback
References: <45AC7341.40004@redhat.com> <45B00A27.5010002@gmx.ch> <45B00ADD.1030409@redhat.com> <m3ejpr2ljm.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <45B1064F.60104@gmx.ch> <17841.1876.23549.889650@zebedee.pink>

Andrew Haley wrote:

Marco Trudel writes:

 > I just wonder how the GCC staff are able to keep the quality so
 > constant and gcj... well... unfortunately not that constant. Can we
 > do something to change that?

You are doing something to change that, aren't you?  You're
downloading and testing raw development versions of the code.

Yes, and I will continue that. But if the GCC core team would do the same, I probably would have run into way more than 3 compilation problems. So maybe we can do something to improve situation here... I'm just interested what others think. Maybe we're just too less people here to do the same as the GCC core team or we have potential problems (as JNICALL) which they don't have... I don't know... But maybe someone on the list knows or has ideas...

Marco

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] Add JDWP VM_INIT JVMTI callback
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- Re: [RFA] Add JDWP VM_INIT JVMTI callback
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]