This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gcj static builds are failing


Tom Tromey wrote:
"Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:

Andrew> At the moment we determine the availability of libmagic at libgcj Andrew> build time. This is wrong, because even if libmagic is present when Andrew> gcj is built, it isn't necessarily present when libgcj apps are built, Andrew> and vice versa.

I don't agree with this.  I think it is safe to assume that whatever
we discover at configure time is true for the lifetime of the libgcj
install.

What about deploying the compiler binaries to users (as mingw, cygwin, Mohan or I do)? Or what about cross compilations where the host will be something different?



I can't think of a case anywhere in GCC where we do
something different than this.

Tom



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]