This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gcj-eclipse-merge-branch] MinGW ecj: Cross-built ecjx?!

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: gnustuff at thisiscool dot com, Adam Megacz <adam at megacz dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 05 Dec 2006 11:34:31 -0700
Subject: Re: [gcj-eclipse-merge-branch] MinGW ecj: Cross-built ecjx?!
References: <64B8IDXXW30DA422YHD54PJ1UXTGE.45756a62@d9300> <m34psaqjr5.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <17781.50365.813163.574152@zebedee.pink>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>> I'm open to solutions.  What would work best?  We could compile the
>> ecj jar, though that is likely to be pretty unfriendly -- it is rather
>> big.

Andrew> That's what I do.  It works Just Fine.

I bet you have a multi-G machine though :-).  I'm just remembering
complaints from other GCC developers when we were doing big
compilations.  I'm ok with it myself though.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gcj-eclipse-merge-branch] MinGW ecj: Cross-built ecjx?!
  - From: Mohan Embar

References:
- Re: [gcj-eclipse-merge-branch] MinGW ecj: Cross-built ecjx?!
  - From: Mohan Embar
- Re: [gcj-eclipse-merge-branch] MinGW ecj: Cross-built ecjx?!
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [gcj-eclipse-merge-branch] MinGW ecj: Cross-built ecjx?!
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]