This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libcj java.nio.DirectBuffer is slow (no inlining)

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
Cc: pierre-olivier dot gaillard at fr dot thalesgroup dot com, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 09 Jun 2006 15:19:29 -0600
Subject: Re: libcj java.nio.DirectBuffer is slow (no inlining)
References: <44859BB9.8000608@fr.thalesgroup.com> <m3odx6grji.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <4485B901.8090906@avtrex.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "David" == David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com> writes:

>> Which specific methods should be inlined but aren't?

David> All methods could be.  The compiler could treat all Buffers as if they
David> were fancy arrays.

Sounds good to me.  I see you added it to the wiki.
Maybe a feature request PR would be appropriate?
Plus a volunteer of course :)

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libcj java.nio.DirectBuffer is slow (no inlining)
  - From: David Daney

References:
- libcj java.nio.DirectBuffer is slow (no inlining)
  - From: P.O. Gaillard
- Re: libcj java.nio.DirectBuffer is slow (no inlining)
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: libcj java.nio.DirectBuffer is slow (no inlining)
  - From: David Daney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]