This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc+gcj build-times?

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: NAKATA Maho <chat95 at mac dot com>
Cc: hendrich at informatik dot uni-hamburg dot de, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:08:27 +0000
Subject: Re: gcc+gcj build-times?
References: <200602221326.k1MDQnqE009813@rzdspc1.informatik.uni-hamburg.de> <17404.26913.482058.606550@zapata.pink> <20060228.214608.41638572.chat95@mac.com>

NAKATA Maho writes:
 > In Message-ID: <17404.26913.482058.606550@zapata.pink> 
 > Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
 > 
 > > Norman Hendrich writes:
 > >  > 2) I "only" have 512 MBytes RAM on this machine. Building gcj (both
 > >  >    "make" and crazily also "make install") required a smidgen more than 
 > >  >    512 megs with corresponding swapping and an unusable machine during
 > >  >    several minutes.
 > > 
 > > This is probably the real cause of the slowdown.
 > 
 > this might be
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24154

Quite likely, although there's another bug that affects ld.

Andrew.

References:
- gcc+gcj build-times?
  - From: Norman Hendrich
- Re: gcc+gcj build-times?
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: gcc+gcj build-times?
  - From: NAKATA Maho

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]