This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Reconsidering gcjx

From: Chris Gray <chris dot gray at kiffer dot be>
To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:39:25 +0100
Subject: Re: Reconsidering gcjx
References: <m3d5iewn0r.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <43D97AEA.50909@bothner.com> <drckhs$j5p$1@sea.gmane.org>

On Friday 27 January 2006 09:10, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

> How big would the mini Java-runtime be?  A bytecode-interpreter, with
> only support for two or three packages, using a simple Baker or
> mark'n'sweep GC, could be done in 10,000 lines of C code or maybe less.

JamVM is pretty small, I doubt it would be worth the effort of trying to make 
something smaller.

-- 
Chris Gray        /k/ Embedded Java Solutions  BE0503765045
Embedded & Mobile Java, OSGi        http://www.kiffer.be/k/
chris.gray@kiffer.be                         +32 3 216 0369
See us at Embedded World 2006 in Nuernberg, 14--16 Feb. 2006.
We're on the DSP Valley stand, no. 12-650 (opposite Intel).

References:
- Reconsidering gcjx
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Reconsidering gcjx
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: Reconsidering gcjx
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]