This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: micro-libgcj merge proposal

From: Joel Dice <dicej at mailsnare dot net>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:26:27 -0700 (MST)
Subject: Re: RFC: micro-libgcj merge proposal
References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0601131049390.14852@joeldicepc.ecovate.com> <17351.60957.314259.868258@zapata.pink>

On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Andrew Haley wrote:

I don't think we should do put anything really incompatible into the
libgcj source tree.  I understand the technical reasons for it, but
divergence is IMO a Bad Thing.

This is a valid concern. Unfortunately, compatibility and compactness seem to be mutually exclusive when it comes to Java. If the consensus turns out to be that divergence from Java is a bad thing, even as a build option, then micro-libgcj will best remain a separate project.

- Joel

References:
- RFC: micro-libgcj merge proposal
  - From: Joel Dice
- Re: RFC: micro-libgcj merge proposal
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]