This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: trying to run Tomcat

From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:23:02 -0800
Subject: Re: trying to run Tomcat
References: <43717600.4010309@bothner.com> <1131529434.3575.165.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43723C96.2060105@bothner.com> <1131563220.2855.25.camel@dhcp83-82.boston.redhat.com> <437361C1.4040903@bothner.com> <17267.25368.51427.476111@zapata.pink>

Andrew Haley wrote:

Per Bothner writes: > I'm a bit surprised. If the tomcat package (say) installed pre-compiled > classes it would seem like it assumes a specific version of java - and > perhaps a specific version of gcj.

Why? I don't see why it should.

Well, if the package really is pre-compiled then it will inherently depend gcj rather than jdk. I don't know how Java packages work these days, but I guess they could be compiled and cached "at need".

Still, does your Q/A really want to support that Java Application X works with *any* valid Java implementation Y, including third-party ones? -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: trying to run Tomcat
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- trying to run Tomcat
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: trying to run Tomcat
  - From: Anthony Green
- Re: trying to run Tomcat
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: trying to run Tomcat
  - From: Anthony Green
- Re: trying to run Tomcat
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: trying to run Tomcat
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]