This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry

From: TJ Laurenzo <tlaurenzo at gmail dot com>
To: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>
Cc: Rui Wang <Rui dot Wang at newcastle dot ac dot uk>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 07:32:22 -0700
Subject: Re: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry
References: <9366880017F98D4EA02E4412380B8202177619@moonraker.campus.ncl.ac.uk> <4371A2BF.3090306@gmail.com> <5652dcd50511090621p13c7b1d7x6262e498df53367@mail.gmail.com> <4372074A.9080809@gmail.com>
Reply-to: tj at laurenzo dot org

> Are you talking of a cross-compiler (target != host) or
> a crossed-native compiler (target==host!=build)? I think
> Rui was complaining about these tools not being generated
> in the cross-compiler case while you might have observed
> these being created in the crossed-native compiler case.
>
> I presume "NATIVE" above checks only for "target==host"
> and therefore your observation.

You're right.  When building the cross compiler, these items are
excluded.  It was when going on from there to build the native
compiler from the cross compiler that they are included.

TJ

References:
- Re: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Re: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry
  - From: TJ Laurenzo
- Re: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry
  - From: Ranjit Mathew

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]