This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: libjava test failures on some targets
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
- Cc: GCJ Hackers <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 20 May 2005 18:06:26 -0600
- Subject: Re: libjava test failures on some targets
- References: <20050521.074448.68143732.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Kaz" == Kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> writes:
Kaz> and if it's reverted with adding #if 0 to natClassLoader.cc:
Kaz> _Jv_RegisterClassHookDefault:
Kaz> then the above testcases pass. I don't understand what is going on
Kaz> here, though.
Is this a build from scratch? Or a rebuild of an existing tree?
This is consistent with a rebuild of an existing tree. After that
patch went in, the libgcj core has to be completely recompiled in
order to properly work.
Kaz> BTW, I couldn't find any PR for it in bugzilla. Should I file it?
If that isn't it, then I don't have a theory. File it and I'll try to
dig up an ia-64 or ppc box.
Tom