[gmane.comp.gcc.devel] [rfc] mainline slush

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

FYI.  You may want to track the gcc list for a while to see if this
goes through.

--- Begin Message ---

• From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
• Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 17:31:29 -0700
• Subject: [rfc] mainline slush
• Approved: news@gmane.org
• Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.devel
• Original-received: from sourceware.org ([12.107.209.250])by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DYYwA-0005xv-2Bfor gcc@gmane.org; Thu, 19 May 2005 02:30:54 +0200
• Original-received: (qmail 22568 invoked by alias); 19 May 2005 00:31:41 -0000
• Original-received: (qmail 22472 invoked from network); 19 May 2005 00:31:37 -0000
• Original-received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 May 2005 00:31:37 -0000
• Original-received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4J0Vbxq032542for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2005 20:31:37 -0400
• Original-received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j4J0VWO10488for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2005 20:31:32 -0400
• Original-received: from ballpeen.sfbay.redhat.com (ballpeen.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.33])by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j4J0VUa8012527for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2005 20:31:30 -0400
• Original-received: from ballpeen.sfbay.redhat.com (ballpeen.sfbay.redhat.com [127.0.0.1])by ballpeen.sfbay.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4J0VU2U008008for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2005 17:31:30 -0700
• Original-received: (from rth@localhost)by ballpeen.sfbay.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j4J0VTgN008007for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 17:31:29 -0700
• Original-to: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
• Original-x-from: gcc-return-114608-gcc=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu May 19 02:31:17 2005
• Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.gcc.devel:66546

After three days of sequential bootstrap breakage, I'd like to propose
that mainline go into slush, wherein all these bootstrap problems, and
all the new testsuites failures get fixed.  No other patches would be
allowed at all.

We'd unslush when the primary platforms have clean test results.

Thoughts?


r~

--- End Message ---

Tom