This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: org.xml.* not in libgcj but libgij

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, Sonja Krause-Harder <skh at suse dot de>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:11:07 +0100
Subject: Re: org.xml.* not in libgcj but libgij
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504182010270.20714@wotan.suse.de><m3u0m34yg6.fsf@localhost.localdomain><Pine.LNX.4.58.0504191504100.20714@wotan.suse.de>

Michael Matz writes:
 > 
 > Btw. I saw it mentioned in the docs, that -findirect-dispatch only
 > works with .class files, but not when directly compiling .java
 > files.  The short testcases OTOH does work just fine when using
 > -findirect-dispatch on the .java source directly.  So, is that
 > documentation outdated, or does it just happen to work in this case
 > by luck (and which circumstance would make it fail, I'm just
 > curious).

Making indirect dispatch work when compiling from source is on the
list of things to be done.

Andrew.

References:
- org.xml.* not in libgcj but libgij
  - From: Michael Matz
- Re: org.xml.* not in libgcj but libgij
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: org.xml.* not in libgcj but libgij
  - From: Michael Matz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]