This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GCC Status Report (2004-09-13) [--enable-mapped-location]


Per Bothner wrote:

Mark Mitchell wrote:

I think you should at least try for initial numbers on whatever machine you're using. Try compiling libstdc++, say, at least. If your patches aren't a performance win, they're not going to be terribly compelling; if they are a win, as expected, then that will make them much more compelling.


It will take a couple of days, at best, as I'll be travelling.

Any earlier C-only test didn't show a clear difference either way.

The patches are "winning" even if the immediate performance difference is a wash because they'll allow us to track column numbers at little
or no extra cost.

Yes, I agree -- if there is no performance downside, then there is some upside. I just want to check that there is indeed no downside, at least.


--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]