This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: my crude benchmark results

From: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Cowie <andrew at operationaldynamics dot com>
Cc: "java at gcc dot gnu dot org" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:59:16 -0400
Subject: Re: my crude benchmark results
References: <8C0581DD-D484-11D8-B739-003065776B20@bestweb.net> <40F41FBF.10408@redhat.com> <1089772335.3356.13.camel@localhost>

Andrew Cowie wrote:

From the sounds of it, --fast-math as an option to gcj is something else entirely. If so,

a) that's very cool b) that's very confusing

Yeah, I suspect --fast-math currently has the dual effect of enabling Math.* inlines in the front end and enabling potentially unsafe math optimizations in the back end. If so we'll want to separate this behaviour, and perhaps enable the inlines by default.

Regards

Bryce

References:
- my crude benchmark results
  - From: John Gabriele
- Re: my crude benchmark results
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: my crude benchmark results
  - From: Andrew Cowie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]